May 26, 2009

What made you decide to become a lawyer?

After euphoria comes nostalgia

This question reminds me of a surprise quiz on my first day in law school.
The gist of my answer then was this: I wanted to become a lawyer because of the gavel.
The judge’s gavel represents power.
The hand that holds the gavel has the power to end or restore a person’s life.
It has the power to levy or liberate one’s property.
It has the power to enforce a right or to deprive the exercise thereof.
I wanted that power.

But young and short-sighted that I was, I failed to see that the gavel is not just about power.
More than power, it represents justice.
The hand that holds the gavel has the responsibility to dispense justice at all times, at all cost.
For no one can be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process.
Due process is the essence of law.

They say that near-death experiences make you see things clearer and help you realize what are essential. The birthing pains of the last bar exam did just that for me. Tired and exhausted from four Sundays’ writing, I looked at my calloused hands and tried to picture a gavel in it. It didn’t work.
Fibisco’s “magduling-dulingan” trick didn’t deliver either.
And then it struck me.
That although my hands are now empty, I can do as many things with these hands – if not more.
I can hold another hand and give hope to someone who was deprived of his day in court.
I can loosen the cuffs and free a man from persecution.
I can raise my hand to protest flagrant violations of human rights.
I can snap my fingers to demand for the speedy disposition of cases.
And when the odds seem not to be in my favor, I can bring these hands together in prayer for courage and guidance.
The sound of the gavel pounding on wooden plate may mean that judgment has been promulgated, but the sound of hands clapping in unison is sweeter to the prevailing party to show that truly justice has once again been served.
Indeed, due process is the essence of law.
And they’re in my hands now. I can make it happen.

Now I look at my hands and I’m instantly reminded why I decided to become a lawyer.
Two hands.
Two words.
Due process.

March 12, 2009

2008 Bar Exam Result: IF IT’S A NO

The results of the 2008 bar exam is due for release days from now. I am anxious.
I stayed in manila for months, out of anyone’s sight. I fossilized in my QC-HQ.
I preoccupied myself with reading, movies, weight management, and spiritual devotion.
I consciously developed good habits, revelled in my new rituals, and communed with God on a daily basis.
I planned on staying here until after the results are out. I was doing just fine.

But as the countdown begins, the pressure is mounting – I’m beginning to doubt my courage.
Every time the breaking news are flashed on tv, I would stop breathing.
Some days, I can think of nothing but the bar result. They follow me even in my sleep.
I’ve seen the two sides of the coin, so to speak. I’ve dreamed of flunking and I’ve dreamed of passing the bar.
The flunking bit was far more realistic, the uneasy feeling stayed with me long after I rose from my bed.
Now I’m really shaken. The courage I had before is being replaced by fear. Fear of what’s about to happen.
Fear that my heart might not withstand the impact. I need a cushion of protection. I need my family. I’m going home.

Right then and there, I booked a flight to Catarman.
Besides, I rationalized, if it’s a ‘no’ I’ll have to go get my books anyway. I can’t avoid them forever.
It’s not their fault if I fail. They’re not the enemy.
Since they’re not my enemy, they should be my ally. So I’ll fight this out with them at my side.
That’s what families are for. Win or lose, pass or fail, they’re involved in this.
Fact is, they’ll be associated with my victory or defeat.
Sink or swim, we’ll be in the same water – the least I can do is let them in on the boat ride.
And a hell of a ride this one’s going to be. The results are due for release sometime next week.
I’m just hoping that I would be in Catarman before the result is out. The anticipation is killing me.

But supposing it’s a no? What if my name’s not in www.sc.judiary.gov.ph official list of 2008 Bar Exam passers?
Or if that site is busy, what if I Google my name in the internet and it yields ‘0 result’? What then?
Oh I’d be really crashed. I’d be disappointed. I’d cry. I’d go to my room and stay there for 40 hours.
I’d talk to no one. I’d sleep on it and dream about it, and when I wake up I’ll be extremely thankful that it was just a dream.
But then I’d realize it was not a dream. A new wave of pain would rush through me. I’d try to sleep back, but I couldn’t lull myself into sleep.
I’d look at the sky. I’d search for God in the clouds. I’d seek enlightenment from the stars.
The cold night’s wind would breeze through my face. I’d be reminded of the cold reality like a slap in the face.
Now that’s the truth I’d try to forget every night, the same truth I’d have to wake up to everyday.
Unfortunately, this is also the kind of truth that people (outside my family) will find hard to forget.
I may ascend in the social ladder by some notable deeds or good fortune,
but a mere mention of this truth (a major screw-up in the past, each of us has one, this happens to be mine)
and I’d plummet to the bottom of the feud chain.
Time heals all wounds, true, but time can’t do anything about the stigma that’s been indelibly printed in my hands and feet.

But I can do something about my growling stomach. I haven’t eaten since the news came out.
I’d go downstairs to grab some food. Starving myself was not how I imagined my death.
I’d eat ice cream – double dutch, extra creamy, on the container, without spoon – the kind reserved only for the major major heartaches and low times. Flunking the bar exam is so in that category, I deserve a gallon.
So there I eat with gusto the cold treat. I think of nothing but the explosions of taste in my mouth.
I sting my tongue and shock my teeth with each bite of coldness, hoping to numb the deeper pain I feel inside.

What did I miss out? Where did I fall short?
Those who did make it were good students, but I had more potential than them.
Intellectually speaking, I was a far cry from them. Don’t you dare remind me about modesty.
That’s the last thing that could make me feel good at moments like this. Never had I felt this low.
Sure there was one time, when my heart was seared in open flame. That was my first broken heart, but that was different.
My heart’s been fed to the dogs alright, but I survived it with barely noticeable a scar.
This one, though, would definitely leave an ugly scar right on my face.
I’be branded for life – a bar flunker, a social outcast, a failure, a loser.

Thankfully I’ve had some practice on how to lose once or twice, on a smaller scale of course.
It taught me that everything shall pass. To keep holding on, never give up, for the best part is yet to come.
If anything, this bar experience (from pre-bar review, to the actual bar, and to my post-bar retreat) drew me closer to God.
I had to fail so He could catch me – so I could feel His power, and so I could learn to trust Him.
The Bar is so great a voyage that one cannot embark half-heartedly, I know that now.
If you’re half prepared, full faith – you’ll capsize midway (there are exceptions of course).
If you’re fully prepared, but lack faith – you’ll run aground before you even get past through the shallow waters
(full effort is not full victory, unfortunately).
If you’re half prepared, and of lukewarm faith – expect to hit the iceberg and soon declare mayday.
Lucky for me I grew up in a coastal town, I don’t have a problem swimming to the shore if it ever gets to that.
What I worry about are the sharks deep under that will come charging at the slightest hint of blood, of injury, of defeat.
A feeding frenzy they will be, and I – in the middle of it all as the humbled prey.
Spare me dear Lord…if I have to die, let it be quick and painless.
If it’s a no, it’s up to You.

April 17, 2009

IT IS FINISHED (An Easter Reflection)

The Gospel According to John 19:30:
When Jesus had received the wine, he said, “It is finished”. Then he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.

It is finished. Natapos na.
Ini an ikaunom nga pulong ni Kristo dida sa Krus.

Natapos na. Nahimo na niya an kaburut-on san Diyos Amay -
An igpas-an sa krus an aton mga sala para an bugos nga katawhan matubos.
Kay Siya gud la an makagsumpay san dalan ngadto sa ginhadian san Diyos -
dalan nga ginguba, ginlinog san sala.

Natapos na an aton pagkauripon san sala.
An kan Kristo kamatayon sa krus mao an nagsimbulo nga kita nga magpakasasala, natubos na.

An Griego para sa “natapos na” mao an “tetelastai” nga an karuyag signgon “paid in full”.
Sa kadaan nga panahon, kun an sayo nga tawo nakabayad na san iya utang, siya in naghihiyok,
naglulurulukso, ngan dara sin kalipay nakagsiyagit sin “tetelastai” para hibatian san ngatanan nga
siya bayad na.

Mao man si Kristo dida sa krus.
An pagbagaw Niya sin “natapos na” in dire sayo nga pag-ungol kay siya nagupo,
napirde san kamatayon, kundi sayo nga pagsiwangag sin pagkamanilampuson.
Kay an Iya misyon didi sa kalibutan natapos na.
By his wounds, we are healed.
By his death, we have eternal life.
His passion is His mission.

An kan Kristo misyon natapos na, pero an aton tagsa-tagsa nga misyon dire pa.
Tama la nga ini nga pulong mao an ikmaunom, dire an ikapito o katapusan nga pulong.
Kay para sa kadam-an sa aton, an ira misyon dire pa tapos, kundi nagpapadayon pa.
An iba ngani, matikang pala. Sayo na ak.

Natapos pala liwat ak kalbaryo sa Bar Exam, pero ak kinabuhi as abogada, natikang pala.
Bago makagamit siton nga 3 letters (A, T & Y) bago sa ak ngaran, kailangan malampasan ko nguna
iton nga bar.
Kada-domingo sa bugos nga bulan san Setyemre, walo iton ka-oras nga magkulop nga sinuratay
tungod kay written exam man an bar.
Maguol sa kamot, stressful, ngan bawal gud magkasakit siton nga mga panahon.

Looy sa Diyos, nakatalwas ak gihapon.
Pero 30% effort, 70% prayers gud adto.
Dire ak makatake much credit sadto kay ako mismo dire ak kontento sa ak preparation.
Cramming ak sadto pirme. Halos tag-2 hours la ak katurog the night before each bar sunday.
Salit nakasugad gud ak nga ak pagpasar by His grace adto.

An ak pagkukulang sa preparation, ginpun-an ko man liwat sa gulpi nga pangamuyo.
Full force man liwat sadto ak prayer brigade.
Ak bug-os nga pamilya, kasangkayan, kaurupdan, ngan ak extended family sa cfc,
mga parokyano sa katilingban san Cawayan, UEP, ngan Lavezares.
Special mention gihapon ak iroy nga gulpi an luhod-luhod sa mga simbahan sa Manila samtang nag-
eexam ak. Sige ak burn the midnight candle, sira man didi sige liwat panadok kandila.

Sa prayers gud ak naghugot sin kusog ngan confidence.
Bago magtikang an exam, giniexercise ko nguna siton ak kamot para mag-upay man ak agi.
Prayer siton ak ginsusurat.
Ak kapot siton sa exam room, ak sign pen sa too nga kamot
ngan an blue rosary nga hatag ni Mana Zeny Peñaranda sa ak wala.
Kusog siton ak kapot nga rosaryo labi kun di ak sigurado sa ak answer. =)

Pero mas matanglay kun dire man mas makuri pa sa actual bar exam an paghinulat na sa result.
Pasakit gud an paghinulat, kay dida na nasulod an doubt, an temptation to succumb to defeat,
to lose faith.
Ak prayer siton nga time, an kan Kristo man ta prayer bago siya ginlingo
sa Garden of Gethsemane – garden of doubt nga:
“Father I know that you can do everything.
But if it is possible, let this cup (of suffering) pass from me.
(Let me pass the bar). But let your will be done, not mine.”

San day of release na sa result, ginkinulba ak siton.
Biyernes adto gingawas, mala liwat biyernes santo am balay. Naduroy la ak kulba.
Ak ginhimo, nagbasa ak book of Psalms sa bible.
Gin-alternate ko an mga salmo sa pagpasalamat, salmo san pagtapud sa Diyos, ngan salmo san
pagtangis tungod san maraot nga palad.
Dida ak siton nainspire pakipustahay kan Lord.

Bagaw ko, “Sige Lord, kun papasaron mo ak, magspeaker ak sa siete palabras -
an ikaunom nga pulong, Natapos na.
Pero kun dire mo ak papasaron, ata an ikaupat nga pulong akon,
an Dyos ko, Dyos ko, kay ano nga ginpabay-an mo ako.”
So is it a deal or no deal? One more or no more?
Kan Lord final answer was no more. No more bar exam for me.

Ak kalbaryo sa bar exam nagtutdo sa ak nga an aton Diyos namamati san aton mga pangamuyo.
This God can hear.
Kunta kita man liwat mahibaro pamati sa Iya kaburut-on sa aton.
Kun pahuwayon ta at tv kun SNN na an palabas,
pahuwayon ta at baba pinanlibak sa at hipid,
pahuwayon ta at huna-huna pag-inihap san may mga sala sa at,
mas mabati kit tiupay kun nano an kaburut-on sa Diyos sa aton mga kinabuhi.

Damo didi an kag-anak.
Maaram siguro kam sa feeling kun an iyo anak dire nasunod dayon sa iyo sugo, pabungul-bungol,
di man paniyan-niyan, damo la an pasangilan. Di ba pareho la iton san pagsulay sa iyo sugo?
Justice delayed is justice denied kumbaga.
Delayed obedience is disobedience.

An dire man kag-anak didi, dire liwat exempted. Kay kita ngatanan mga anak san Diyos.
Ngan bilang anak san Diyos, angay la nga tikangan ta man an pagsunod san kaburut-on san Diyos.
Christ’s life, from conception to his death on the cross, was all about following His Father’s will.

Bugto ko kan Kristo, tama na an pabungol-bungol, an paniyan-niyan, an pabuwas-buwas.
Kay maupay kun nakasiguro kit nga makaimod pa kit Santino buwas.
Maupay kun nakasiguro kit nga may bukas pa.

Student ID man o Senior Citizen’s Card im gamit, it’s never to late to start a life dedicated
for God’s purpose.
Rick Warrren, author of the best-selling book “A purpose-driven life”, said that:
A life of worship, a life of fellowship, a life of discipleship, a life of ministry,
and a life of service, is a life well-lived.

Mao kunta iton nga kinabuhi an aton hingayapon ngan talinguhaon para sa aton kalugaringon,
sa aton anak o magiging anak, sa aton pamilya, sa aton komunidad, sa aton nasud,
ngan sa bug-os nga kalibutan.

Para kun umabot na an takna nga kita kinahanglan na bumaya sa kalibutan ngan umatubang
kan Kristo, masugad ta man liwat nga:
Bro, ako liwat, an akon misyon, Natapos na.

April 18, 2009

The 25 Greatest Legal Movies

1. TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD (1962)

Gregory Peck lends his legendary dignity to the role of Atticus Finch, Harper Lee’s iconic small-town attorney. Penned for the screen by Horton Foote, the movie was an instant classic, as lawyer Finch rises above the naked racism of Depression-era Alabama to defend a crippled black man (Brock Peters) falsely accused of rape by a lonely, young white woman.

Finch’s quiet courage is seen through the eyes of Scout (Mary Badham), his 6-year-old daughter, and embraced by an emerging generation of lawyers as the epitome of both moral certainty and unyielding trust in the rule of law.

When the accuser’s drunken, incredulous father glares and asks Atticus, “What kind of man are you?” the unspoken answer is easy: both the self-assured lawyer and upright human being we all hope to be.

TRIVIA: Three Oscar wins. Finch was Lee’s mother’s maiden name.

2. 12 ANGRY MEN (1957)

Henry Fonda produced and starred in this faithful adaptation of Reginald Rose’s critically acclaimed stage play chron­icling the hostile deliberations of a jury in a death pen­alty case. A lone juror (Fonda) expresses his doubts about what seems at first an open-and-shut prosecution.

What tumbles out of the ensuing dis­cussion is a gut-wrenching examination of the prej­udices, prejudgments and personal psychological baggage these assembled citizens have brought to a life-or-death debate over the fate of the young Puerto Rican defendant.

Based on Rose’s own experience as a juror in a manslaughter trial, the play was first adapted for TV by Sidney Lumet, who went on to direct the movie version, his first feature film.

TRIVIA: Lost all three Oscar nominations to The Bridge on the River Kwai.

Henry Fonda produced and starred in this faithful adaptation of Reginald Rose’s critically acclaimed stage play chron­icling the hostile deliberations of a jury in a death pen­alty case. A lone juror (Fonda) expresses his doubts about what seems at first an open-and-shut prosecution.

What tumbles out of the ensuing dis­cussion is a gut-wrenching examination of the prej­udices, prejudgments and personal psychological baggage these assembled citizens have brought to a life-or-death debate over the fate of the young Puerto Rican defendant.

Based on Rose’s own experience as a juror in a manslaughter trial, the play was first adapted for TV by Sidney Lumet, who went on to direct the movie version, his first feature film.

TRIVIA: Lost all three Oscar nominations to The Bridge on the River Kwai.

3. MY COUSIN VINNY (1992)

Vincent “Vinny” Gambini (Joe Pesci) is a brash Brooklyn lawyer who only recently managed to pass the bar exam on his sixth try. He’s representing his cousin and a friend—two California-bound college students who are arrested for capital murder after a short stop at a convenience store in rural Alabama. Still, the rule of law prevails in the courtroom of Judge Chamberlain Haller (Fred Gwynne).

The movie packs in cinema’s briefest opening argument (“Everything that guy just said is bullshit.”), its best-ever introduction to the rules of criminal procedure, and a case that hinges on properly introduced expert tes­timony regarding tire marks left by a 1964 Skylark and the optimal boiling time of grits.

TRIVIA: Marisa Tomei won the Oscar for best supporting actress.

4. ANATOMY OF A MURDER (1959)

Otto Preminger directs this realistic study of an Army lieutenant accused of murdering a bartender who allegedly raped his coquettish wife. An A-list cast is headed by James Stewart as the defense attorney, George C. Scott as prosecutor, Ben Gazzara as the de­fendant and Lee Remick as his wife.

The surprise, though, is the stupendous performance in the role of the judge by real-life lawyer Joseph Welch, who represented the Army in the McCarthy hearings. The plot skips nimbly through a thicket of ethical dilemmas involved in representing a murder defendant.

It was inspired by an actual case and adapted from a novel written by a Michigan supreme court judge. The original score is by Duke Ellington, who makes a cameo.

TRIVIA: Nominated for seven Oscars. Lost for “Best Picture” to Ben-Hur.

5. INHERIT THE WIND (1960)

Two grand old lions of the screen, Spencer Tracy and Frederic March, play two grand old lions of the law, Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan, as they grapple in the historic 1925 Scopes “monkey trial” in backwoods Dayton, Tenn.

The film, adapted from a 1955 play by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, is a fictionalized account, and the characters’ names are changed, however slightly (Tracy’s Darrow is Henry Drummond, and March’s Bryan is Matthew Harrison Brady).

But much of the courtroom testimony was taken straight from the trial transcript. Nor have Americans evolved much; 80 years later a federal judge in Pennsylvania was forced to rule on “intelligent design.”

TRIVIA: “He that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind.” Proverbs 11:29

6. WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION (1957)

The legendary Billy Wilder (Some Like It Hot, The Apartment) directs from a script by the legendary mystery writer Agatha Christie. But it’s the legendary Charles Laughton who fills the screen as the pompous barrister who is supposed to be retired after recovering from an illness but can’t resist taking a puzzling murder case.

Real-life wife Elsa Lanchester is his sharp-tongued nurse, and the two sparkle as they verbally spar. Tyrone Power is the playboy defendant; Marlene Dietrich is his wife and, surprisingly, the witness in question. It’s not the only surprise, as befits a Dame Agatha story. Watch for yourself.

TRIVIA: Nominated for six Oscars. Dietrich was crushed not to be among those nominated.

7. BREAKER MORANT (1980)

Australian director Bruce Beresford adapts the story of three fellow coun­trymen who fight for the British Empire in the colonial Boer War in South Africa and are tried and convicted of war crimes.

The issues raised in the 1901 guerrilla-war trial echo through decades of 20th century wars: Which orders to follow, which civilians are the enemy, etc. Includes outstanding performanc­es, es­pecially by Edward Woodward and Bryan Brown as the Australian officers and by Jack Thompson as their disheveled defense attorney.

TRIVIA: Oscar-nominated for “Best Adapted Screenplay”. Ordinary people took the trophy.

8. PHILADELPHIA (1993)

Tom Hanks won an Oscar as an Ivy-educated gay attorney who claims his big-time law firm fired him after discovering he contracted AIDS.

The somewhat dated and self-righteous script is saved by Denzel Washington’s vibrant and nuanced performance as the solo personal injury lawyer who takes the case when everyone else turns Hanks’ character down, and who comes to terms with his own homophobia. Bruce Springsteen fans will enjoy the Boss’s Oscar-winning title song.

TRIVIA: That the film is “inspired in part” by the life and litigation of Geoffrey Bowers, an attorney who died of aids, is the result of a real-life lawsuit.

9. ERIN BROCKOVICH (2000)

Julia Roberts does an Academy Award-winning turn as the real-life paralegal and sassy single mom whose dogged investigation into a suspicious real estate case turns up a pattern of illegal dumping of highly toxic hexa­valent chromium and one of the heftiest class action suits in U.S. history. Albert Finney portrays her boss, Ed Masry.

Lawyer line of the movie, she to him: “Do they teach lawyers to apologize? ’Cause you suck at it.”

TRIVIA: The real Brockovich and the real Masry make cameo appearances in a restaurant.

10. THE VERDICT (1982)

Paul Newman is a washed-up, alco­holic lawyer who gets handed a medical-malpractice case and sees it as one last chance to get his career right. James Mason is diabolical as his courtroom opponent who cavorts with the judge, played by Milo O’Shea. Charlotte Rampling is the love interest—whose interests may not be those of Newman’s character. Tight and tense direction by Sidney Lumet (12 Angry Men, Dog Day Afternoon).

TRIVIA: Nominated for five Oscars in the year of Gandhi

11. PRESUMED INNOCENT (1990)

Lawyer-novelist Scott Turow’s best-seller features Harrison Ford as Rusty Sabich, a top-notch prosecutor who finds himself accused of murdering a colleague with whom he’s had an affair.

Through his lawyer, Sandy Stern (Raul Julia), Sabich discovers the seamy side of himself and the criminal law—a view that both offends and saves him. The well-constructed plot includes a dark twist at the end that Sabich will have to learn to live with.

TRIVIA: Produced by Alan J. Pakula, who early in his career produced To Kill a Mockingbird.

12. JUDGMENT AT NUREMBERT (1961)

Stanley Kramer directed this searing portrayal of the Nazi war crimes trials set in 1948. The Abby Mann script focuses, in particular, on charges brought against four German judges who are accused of allowing their courts to become accomplices to Nazi atrocities.

An American judge, Dan Haywood (Spencer Tracy), finds himself trying to understand how these once-esteemed colleagues allowed themselves to be used. He gets little or no help from average Germans, who are busy distancing themselves from Germany’s Nazi past.

When one of the judges, Ernst Janning (Burt Lancaster), breaks from the others and confesses, it becomes clear that—whatever their original intentions—these judges have chosen political obligations over their personal senses of right and wrong.

TRIVIA: Won two Oscars. Marlene Dietrich, who personally experienced the Nazi regime, was allowed to write many of her own lines.

13. A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS (1966)

Paul Scofield’s Oscar-winning performance as Sir Thomas More, the Tudor-era judge made chancellor of England. He is caught in the political struggle involving Henry VIII’s decision to defy the Roman Catholic Church and divorce his wife to wed Anne Boleyn.

Lines from playwright Robert Bolt’s stirring script are fre­quently quoted in U.S. court opinions: “I know what’s legal, not what’s right. And I’ll stick to what’s legal.” And: “This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast—man’s laws, not God’s! And if you cut them down, and you’re just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then?”

TRIVIA: Won six Oscars, including “Best Picture” and “Best Director” (Fred Zinnemann).

14. A FEW GOOD MEN (1992)

Say what you will about Tom Cruise, but he is high-octane as a re­luctant Navy JAG litigator in Rob Reiner’s suspenseful film iteration of this military courtroom drama by Aaron Sorkin (creator of The West Wing). Two low-ranking Marines from the Guantanamo Bay naval base are being court-martialed for the death of anoth­er, allegedly part of an unofficial pun­ishment known as a “code red.”

The Marines say they were following orders. Their unapologetic commander, Col. Nathan Jessep (an absolutely electric Jack Nicholson) says they acted on their own. The truth, if you can handle it, turns out to be something more complicated than a sense of duty—but some­times, exactly that.

TRIVIA: Sorkin based his original play on a military case prosecuted by David Iglesias, later U.S. Attorney for New Mexico.

15. CHICAGO (2002)

Lawyers tap-dance all the time, but Richard Gere does so pretty darn well as sleazeball attorney Billy Flynn in the film adaptation of the highly successful Bob Fosse musical. Catherine Zeta-Jones and Renee Zellweger play celebrity murderers who cynically parlay their Jazz Age notoriety into a vaudeville act.

Maurine Dallas Watkins’ original play, Chicago, or Play Ball, produced as a silent film by Cecil B. DeMille in 1927 (and later, the 1942 Ginger Rogers vehicle Roxie Hart), is based on two actual murder trials she covered as a reporter for the Chicago Tribune.

TRIVIA: Won six Oscars. In the original Broadway production, Flynn was played by the late Jerry Orbach of Law & Order TV fame.

16. KRAMER VS. KRAMER (1979)

Dustin Hoffman and Meryl Streep both won Oscars as Ted and Joanna Kramer, an estranged couple fighting over custody of their son.

Ted deals with real fatherhood for the first time as a single dad when Joanna leaves him. But he must also face his own failures when Joanna resurfaces demanding to gain custody of their son. An all-too-painful reminder of the human toll that is pos­sible when domestic relations litigation takes a nasty turn.

TRIVIA: Won five Oscars. For some of the most complex scenes, Hoffman leaned on his own recent experience with divorce.

17. THE PAPER CHASE (1973)

James T. Hart (Timothy Bottoms) is a first-year law student desperately seeking the approval of Harvard’s stern­est professor, Charles W. Kingsfield Jr. (John Houseman). He begins to get the respect that he’s earned, only to discover that the young woman he’s involved with (Lindsay Wagner) is the professor’s daughter.

The real drama, however, is the demanding milieu of Harvard Law School, where reputations can be made and broken in a single, grueling class.

TRIVIA: Houseman reprised his Oscar-winning role as Kingsfield for four seasons on television.

18. REVERSAL OF FORTUNE (1990)

Before there was an O.J. to help confuse us about the difference between innocent and not guilty, there was Claus von Bulow. Jeremy Irons won an Oscar for his portrayal of the feckless von Bulow, crassly dependent husband of Newport, R.I., socialite Sunny von Bulow, who lapsed into a coma when she was allegedly injected with an overdose of insulin.

Tried and convicted of attempted murder in 1982, largely on privately gathered evidence, von Bulow hires Alan Dershowitz, the now ubiq­uitous Harvard law professor, whose account of the case is the basis for this movie.

The law line of the movie oc­­curs when von Bulow is attempting to explain to Dershowitz (Ron Silver) what actually happened: “No,” shrugs Dershowitz. “Never let defendants explain; puts most of them in an awkward position.” “How do you mean?” asks von Bulow. “Lying,” says Dershowitz.

TRIVIA: Dershowitz appears in cameo as a judge on the appellate court.

19. COMPULSION (1959)

In 1924, Chicago is rocked by a spectacular murder, apparently com­mitted by two brilliant teenagers from wealthy families who have sought to plot and execute the perfect crime.

An aging legendary lawyer, Jonathan Wilk (Orson Welles), is hired to defend the young men with the modest hope of sparing them from the gallows. The film is based on Clarence Darrow’s actual defense of Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb, director Richard Fleischer turns the sordid details of their vicious crime into a passionate attack on the death penalty.

TRIVIA: When studio publicists advertised the film’s connection to the Leopold and Loeb case, Leopold sued for invasion of privacy. He lost.

20. AND JUSTICE FOR ALL (1979)

An angry Al Pacino (is there any other kind?) plays Arthur Kirkland, the very best lawyer he knows in Baltimore. His client is losing his marbles; his girlfriend is losing her patience; the senior judge plots suicidal fantasies. Moreover, he is trapped into representing a judge accused of rape—a judge who is gleefully ignoring the incarceration of a very in­nocent and distressed Kirkland client.

All of this is thrown together in a final courtroom harangue that makes Pacino’s bank robber mugging in Dog Day Afternoon sound like Trappist prayer. You think I’m outta order? Hey, courtroom or not, it’s Pacino.

TRIVIA: Jack Warden, who plays a suicidal judge, appears in two other films on the ABA Journal’s “25 Greatest Legal Movies”, 12 Angry Men and The Verdict.

21. IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER (1993)

Pete Postlethwaite and Daniel Day-Lewis play Giuseppe and Gerry Conlon, a real-life father and son falsely accused of participating in two separate IRA bombing sprees outside London. The film chronicles their struggle to convince British courts of their innocence.

After 15 years, human rights lawyer Gareth Peirce (Emma Thompson) is able to prove that police had altered records of their interrogations, forcing a British court to release the younger Conlon and his three alleged co-conspirators. Six others were exonerated after serving their sen­tences. A seventh, Giuseppe Conlon, died in prison.

TRIVIA: Nominated for seven Oscars. No wins.

22. A CIVIL ACTION (1998)

On its surface, this is a David vs. Goliath: Small-firm Boston plaintiffs lawyers up against two conglomerates whose tannery, they’ve decided, is responsible for the leukemia-related deaths of eight children. At its core, however, this is a grown-up thriller about the perilous practical consequences of demanding moral outcomes from a legal action better suited to risk-and-reward.

John Travolta is earnest as Jan Schlicht­mann, the firm’s senior partner whose outrage drives the firm into a war of at­trition against a better-funded foe. Robert Duvall is adroit as the quirky Jerome Facher, a corporate lawyer whose experience predicts Schlichtmann’s every naive move.

Best lawyer line goes to Facher: “Pride has lost more cases than lousy evidence, idiot witnesses and a hanging judge all put together. There is absolutely no place in a courtroom for pride.”

TRIVIA: Nominated for two Oscars. Schlichtmann still practices law in Beverly, Mass.

23. YOUNG MR. LINCOLN (1939)

Henry Fonda makes an engaging, beardless and believable Abraham Lincoln in John Ford’s fictionalized account of Lincoln’s early adult years from New Salem to Springfield, and—this being Hollywood—from the lovely and doomed Ann Rutledge to the ambitious and manipulative Mary Todd. The key plot point revolves around a killing that takes place during a July 4 brawl.

As a newly minted lawyer, the young Lincoln manages to quell a lynch mob by telling them he needs the two brothers accused in the murder to be his first real clients. The film won an Academy Award for its screenplay and has been named to the National Film Registry.

TRIVIA: Oscar-nominated for best writing, original story. The Academy Award went to Mr. Smith goes to Washington.

24. AMISTAD (1997)

Steven Spielberg directed this historic drama of the famous 1839 slave ship uprising. An all-star cast includes Matthew McConaughey, Morgan Freeman and Anthony Hopkins as former President John Quincy Adams, who argues the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Justice Harry Blackmun reads the court’s opinion in a cameo role as Justice Joseph Story. The film was criticized for taking liberties with the facts, but it succeeds as a portrayal of antebellum America coming to grips with slavery—and how the law was employed both for and against.

TRIVIA: Nominated for four Oscars.

25. MIRACLE ON 34TH STREET (1947)

The holiday classic has one of the most improbable courtroom scenes ever. But then, how would you go about proving that your client is the real Santa Claus? John Payne portrays the eager young attorney whose client, one Kris Kringle (played by Edmund Gwenn), calmly insists he’s St. Nick. Maureen O’Hara is the cyn­ical businesswoman who finally believes.

Her daughter, a young Natalie Wood, eventually does too. Treacle, to be sure, but with a humorous edge that has kept it going for Christmases past, present and future.

TRIVIA: Won three Oscars and ranked no. 9 among The American Film Institute’s “Most Inspiring Films of All Time”.

and here are the HONORABLE MENTIONS
among the other Legal films our jury cited (in alphabetical order):

THE ACCUSED (1988) Jodie Foster is a woman who is gang-raped in a bar and, when the rapists go free, goads a reluctant prosecutor to pursue the patrons who urged them on.

ADAM’S RIB (1949) George Cukor’s mannered comedy, with Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn as married lawyers who oppose each other in court.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT (1956) Dana Andrews is a writer who sets himself up on a murder rap to reveal the shortcomings of circum­stantial evidence.

THE CAINE MUTINY (1954) Humphrey Bogart is riveting in this adaptation of Herman Wouk’s complex novel about military authority and moral duty.

CLASS ACTION (1991) A father and daughter clash in and outside the courtroom as they square off in a volatile product liability case.

THE CLIENT (1994) Susan Sarandon is an underwhelming lawyer who finds herself representing a young boy who has witnessed a Mafia hit.

COUNSELLOR AT LAW (1933) John Barrymore is a workaholic lawyer who is in danger of losing his family in this William Wyler film.

THE COURT-MARTIAL OF BILLY MITCHELL (1955) Otto Preminger directs Gary Cooper in this tale of the real-life maverick general who thinks an airplane can sink a ship—and is court-martialed for proving it.

THE DEVIL’S ADVOCATE (1997) A new attorney introduced into the world’s most powerful law firm discovers that its managing partner is morally challenged.

THE FIRM (1993) Tom Cruise is recruited by a prestigious law firm that he gradually learns has a very sinister background.

THE FORTUNE COOKIE (1966) Walter Matthau and Jack Lemmon romp in this Billy Wilder comedy about a sleazy lawyer who talks a relative into feigning injury for the sake of a lawsuit.

GHOSTS OF MISSISSIPPI (1996) The true story of efforts to bring to justice Byron De La Beckwith for the 30-year-old murder of civil rights activist Medgar Evers.

INTOLERABLE CRUELTY (2003) The Coen brothers reveal their take on divorce law. George Clooney is at his toothy best.

JAGGED EDGE (1985) Defense attorney Glenn Close gets close to a client, played by Jeff Bridges, who is on trial for the murder of his heiress wife.

JFK (1991) Oliver Stone takes on New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison’s efforts to solve the Kennedy assassination. History yields to riveting storytelling.

LEGALLY BLONDE (2001) Reese Witherspoon became one of the most sought-after actresses in Hollywood after ridiculing the elitism of Harvard Law.

LIAR, LIAR (1997) A hilarious vehicle for Jim Carrey, who plays a lawyer who finds he is physically incapable of telling a fib.

MICHAEL CLAYTON (2007) George Clooney shines in this look at the dark underbelly of big-firm law.

MUSIC BOX (1989) Hungarian immigrant Mike Laszlo, accused of being a war criminal, asks his daughter (Jessica Lange) to defend him in court. She learns more about him than she wants to know.

NORTH COUNTRY (2005) It’s one wom­an against the system: The extra­ordinary Charlize Theron plays a miner who sues the company.

THE PELICAN BRIEF (1993) A law stu­dent discovers a plot to assassinate U.S. Supreme Court justices in this John Grisham adaptation.

THE PEOPLE VS. LARRY FLYNT (1996) Cameos abound in this portrayal of the trial of the renowned porn publisher.

PRIMAL FEAR (1996) Richard Gere is the attorney and Edward Norton a young altar boy accused of killing a priest in a story whose plot twists and turns.

THE RAINMAKER (1997) Another John Grisham lawyer fights the system, this time with Matt Damon starring and Francis Ford Coppola directing.

A TIME TO KILL (1996) An earnest retelling of the Grisham novel about a racially charged killing in the Deep South. Matthew McConaughey and Sandra Bullock spark.

Source: http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/honorable_mentions

May 1, 2009

So help me God.

Another milestone at 25.

On April 28, 2009, exactly 25 days after the release of the bar exam result, I took my lawyer’s oath at the plenary hall of PICC, alongside the rest of the 1,310 new lawyers who hurdled the 2008 bar examination.

The ceremony lasted for almost two hours.
We were advised to come at least 2 hours early, but we arrived at the venue quarter past 1.
The entrance for the inductees and guests (two for each inductee) were separate.
It started at exactly 2pm.
My parents were still outside the plenary hall waiting in line when the national anthem was sang.
Security was very tight. No cameras and cellphones were allowed inside the plenary hall (although some were able to sneak in their cam).

Inside the plenary hall, the predominant color was black.
The inductees in toga occupied the front rows while guests were at the back rows and the balcony (including my parents).

Facing us at the right side of the stage were the law school deans.
On the left side of the stage were 8 empty seats for the bar examiners. And on center stage was a long table for the 15 Supreme Court Justices.

The crowd hushed as the spotlight was focused on center-stage to herald the unveiling of the bar examiners.
Amidst cheers and jeers, their names were called in the order of the bar exam subjects:

Political law and Public International law – Atty. Juanito G. Arcilla
Labor law and Social Legislation – Atty. Salvador A. Poquiz
Civil law – Atty. Cynthia R. Del Castillo
Taxation – Atty. Victorino C. Mamalateo
Mercantile law – Justice Sixto C. Marella, Jr.
Criminal law – Justice Rodolfo G. Palattao
Remedial law – Justice Lucas P. Bersamin
Legal Ethics and Practical exercises – Justice Francisco P. Acosta

The biggest cheer was given to Labor law examiner Atty. Poquiz and the new SC Justice Remedial law examiner Justice Bersamin, while the loudest jeer was given to Taxation examiner Atty. Mamalateo and Criminal law examiner Justice Palatao.

The SC Justices then entered the stage to complete the majestic picture. Seated at the center, of course, was the Chief – CJ Reynato Puno.

2008 Bar Chairman Justice Tinga lighted up the hall by his witty comments about the bar examiners. Like this particular examiner was a faculty of UE, when he was the school dean. This one examiner graduated magna cum laude, but Tinga was his teacher.
He ended with a promise (more like a threat) that next year’s bar chairman Justice Nachura will beat this year’s all-time record of the most number of examinees by having the most number of bar passers.

It wasn’t my first time to hear the Supreme Court hymn because it was a monday when I applied for my Bar exam permit at SC, so I’ve attended their flag ceremony.
But I sure was surprised when the Lawyer’s Oath was sang by the Arellano chorale group!
More worried than surprised actually.
So they’ve sang it, does that mean we won’t be reciting our oath the conventional way?
All the memorizing of the oath since first year law for nothing?
I was ready to protest =).
Good thing, the master of ceremony next made us raise our right hand to recite our solemn oath.
There’s so much history (and yes, drama) in that oath, I just can’t miss that.

The petition to accept the inductees to the Philippine bar was confirmed by CJ Puno, without any objection thankfully.

Now it’s official.
I am Atty. Kareen May Eulin Argenio of Catarman, Northern Samar.
So help me God.

(P.S. Special thanks to Atty. Aaron Tampon for making the whole experience less impersonal. )